SKU: 17045017661
night vision goggles quad

night vision goggles quad QTNVG Quad Tube Night Vision Device – KommandoStore

Sale price$18.87 Regular price$20.97
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $5.24 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 29 - Aug 3

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

night vision goggles quad QTNVG Quad Tube Night Vision Device – KommandoStore120 Field of View 25hrs (Extendable 125hrs) Adjustable Diopter IP67 Rated Available to US Customers Only: All ITAR Regulations Apply KommandoStore is proud to introduce the Quad Tube Night Vision Goggle (QTNVG). With an unmatched 120 field of view, the QTNVG delivers superb performance for the most demanding nighttime tasks. Capable panoramic night vision has never been more within reach. The Housing: The night vision market has a FOV problem.

120° Field of View  25hrs (Extendable 125hrs)  Adjustable Diopter  IP67 Rated

 

Available to US Customers Only: All ITAR Regulations Apply

KommandoStore is proud to introduce the Quad Tube Night Vision Goggle (QTNVG). With an unmatched 120° field of view, the QTNVG delivers superb performance for the most demanding nighttime tasks. Capable panoramic night vision has never been more within reach.

The Housing:

The night vision market has a FOV problem. Virtually all commercial sales are limited to a small number of dual tube units with the same 40-51 degrees of vision. While quad tube units are nothing new, manufacturers have long restricted sales of these products to military and elite law enforcement. Although the technology is not illegal, sales restrictions and absurdly high prices have effectively barred many law-abiding Americans from ownership. When used panoramic devices make their way onto the market, hostile warranty and repair practices ensure an unpleasant experience. It is our view that civilians and regular law enforcement officers have a legitimate right to this technologythis is the primary reason behind our pursuit of the QTNVG.

So why do I want more FOV? Why would I select the QTNVG over a traditional dual tube unit?

Short answer: To increase instantaneous availability of visual data.

Vision System  Field of View (Degrees)
PVS-14 40
Dual Tube Binocular 40-51
QTNVG 120
Human Eye 135

Long Answer:

When using a monocular or dual tube solution, it is essential that the operator overcome the field of view (FOV) limitations by constantly scanning their environment. In practice this is tedious and prone to error; even with modern dual tube NODs 'tunnel vision' is very real and very deadly threat. While scanning does work, it places a high cognitive burden on the operator leading to fatigue and mistakes.

Even with perfect scanning discipline, certain situations are inherently dangerous with the limited FOV imposed by conventional NODs. Perhaps the most notable is clearing rooms. When you're kicking down doors the perceptual delay imposed by scanning is significant—greatly reducing your window to safely respond to threats.

What if I’m not a high-speed operator taking down structures rapidly with my team of cool guys?

But you probably have a car, quad, hoverboard, hang glider, or some other way to get around the world, right? While driving is completely possible with monocular or a binocular unit, only a quad tube unit will give you the full picture. Go sit in your preferred means of conveyance and hold a toilet paper tube about a half inch away from your eye. Now, try to look at the rear-view mirror, side-view mirror, or any other control that is outside the immediate 40-degree field of view on the ToiletPaper-14. When you are walking around on your two legs, the option to stop and scan your FOV is usually there. However, if you are flying down dirt roads at 40mph can you really afford to be swinging your head around?

Okay, I get it, I can drive really fast and take down structures like a cool guy. What else can I do?

Aside from the driving and CQB benefits, quad tube units provide a couple other pros over monos and even some dual offerings. Among the most important is a dramatic improvement in passive aiming. Over the last decade, adoption of night vision has rapidly accelerated in almost every segment of society. This proliferation of low cost, high reliability NODs means that if you're using an aiming laser or IR illuminator, odds are someone else can see you. In the '90s it may have been a different story, but it's 2020 now and Joe down the street with his Sightmark Wraith HD digital rifle scope  can kill you just as dead as anything.

Passive aiming (being able to aim without giving off an active IR signature) becomes extremely easy with quads. While possible on monos and passable on duals, quads make it dead easy to naturally aim down red dot or holographic optics. Throwing an Aimpoint T2 on a Unity Tactical FAST Micro Mount allows you to have a fantastic day/night zero with very little in the way of ergonomic shifts as the sun goes down.

Additionally, we have found that some people suffer from motion sickness under conventional FOV NODs. In our experience this usually happens when tracking moving objects—specifically when the user's eyes exceed the available field of view offered by the device. When this happens, the disconnect between what the brain is expecting (continuity of vision) and what it gets (complete darkness) leads to nausea. With the QTNVG, this is effect is greatly reduced as the 120° panoramic view closely matches the 130° God gave you.

But I’ve heard that most quad units sacrifice features over duals!

This is true on some legacy units, however this is not the case for QTNVGs. With QTNVGs, you get every feature you would expect on a proper dual tube night vision unit. The QTNVG has full adjustment to suit the end user, including pupillary distance (PD) and diopter adjustment ensuring perfect usability with the widest possible range of users. Auxiliary features include built in IR illuminators which assist in admin tasks such as reading maps, operating doors, identifying ammo cans, or selecting the correct flavor of Fanta (orange) from the cooler.

The QTNVG also makes use of standard MX10160 style image intensification tubes, enabling easy upgrades and interoperability. Many pano users also choose to swap tubes around as they age and wear with use, balancing blems to the outer edges of their vision.

Four tubes? Doesn’t that mean one quarter the battery life?

Not a problem! The QTNVG has an onboard CR123A battery providing up to 25 hours of run time. If this isn't enough for you needs, it also supports an optional helmet mounted battery pack to further increase battery life in excess of 100 hours. This modularity allows you to decide how you want to run the unit based on the situation: as light as possible or maximum on time.

What about X, Y, or Z units?

The sad reality of the quad tube night vision market is that you don't have many choices. And when you scope those choices down to units you can actually buy without violating manufacturer restrictions, you options all but evaporate. Let’s take a look how the QTNVG stacks up against some contemporary options:

Unit Weight Available Tube Type Diopter Adjustment FOV Cost
QTNVG 30 oz Yes

MX10160

Standard

Onboard 120°

$13,500+

ANVIS-10* 28.8 oz

Out of

Production

Proprietary

(Rare)

External

Lenses

97°

Second hand only

$15,000+

GPNVG-18 28.8 oz MIL/LE Only MX10160 Standard

External

Lenses

97°

$38,000+

*No warranty support, spare parts, or repairs available to civilians.


Tube Specifications:

All phosphor image intensifier tubes are made in large, identically formed batches. This manufacturing process has an inherent level of variability, just like the processes used to create modern CPUs. Obviously Elbit and L3 do their best to minimize intra-batch differences, but it is a fact of life in night vision.

Because of this variability, each batch of tubes shakes out into several distinct grades. At Elbit they sort into three categories. In descending order these are SLGDT, SLG, and XLS. In layman's terms these grades roughly correspond to Aviation/Magnified use, Ground Use/1x Use (High Grade), and Ground Use/1x Use (Mid Grade). Tubes that do not meet minimum XLS standards are destroyed.

Grading is accomplished with a minimum standard model. Each grade of tube has minimum values for photocathode response, figure of merit, gain, halo, resolution, signal to noise ratio, and blemishes. In other words, a tube could be Aviation grade in all respects but have a 0.003" blem in zone one---making it land in XLS rather than SLGDT.

To prevent cherry picking Elbit does not release full spec sheets for each tube from the factory. Instead they just guarantee the minimum values for each grade.

In practice this means that:
  • SLGDT tubes meet military aviation standards and are suitable for magnified use. In these applications even pinprick peripheral blemishes can completely disqualify an intensifier tube. Because of this, SLGDT tubes are among the most expensive on the market. 
  • SLG tubes meet military specifications for use in ground based systems. Particularly those where users are not highly magnifying the image (i.e. head mounted NODs). It's important to note that these are not a "compromise" over aviation grade, SLG tubes are incredibly high quality---especially so in the latest 2020 manufacturing batches

So what about XLS?

XLS tubes are physically identical to the SLGDT and SLG tubes above, however the XLS rating is a commercial specification. This makes XLS tubes an incredibly attractive value proposition for the average night vision user.

In plain English: XLS is the grade that Elbit uses to classify tubes that do not meet the milspec. Does that make them bad tubes? Not necessarily. The vast majority of XLS tubes are SLG or SLGDT spec with minor blems.

  • Single small needle sized pin prick (0.003-0.006”) in zone 1? Sorry pal that’s not milspec!
  • More than two of those pin pricks in zone 3? No soup for you!
  • etc.

Now obviously nobody wants a blem in their unit, but how much usability does a small pinprick take away? The answer is very little when used as intended. Like death and taxes blems are a fact of life in night vision; even the best intensifiers will form small blemishes and imperfections with regular use. It's an unavoidable side effect of the technology.

If you're the type of person that likes to sit inside and stare at solid white walls, you will absolutely pick up a blem of any size. In more realistic field conditions blems become extremely hard to spot against dark dynamic backgrounds.

Because of this, we believe that XLS tubes offer an unmatched value to the customer. With an XLS tube you can enjoy night vision which is every bit as functional as higher-grades whilst saving hundreds of dollars. This means more money for practice and training under night vision---and believe me practice is essential.

Here are the zones commonly referred to in night vision documentation:

If you have any further questions regarding XLS vs SLG, please email us or make use of the live chat and one of our representatives will chime in with photos, additional information, and personal anecdotes.

Your included spec sheets will detail any blemishes that are on the individual unit and the full tube specifications.

Additional custom tube configurations are available per customer request. Please email us at [email protected] to discuss configurations.

Warranty and Return Policy:

The QTNVG carries a one-year manufacturer limited warranty on the housing and internal optics. This warranty covers failures due to manufacturing defects, and premature failure during normal use. Outside of this warranty period, repairs and replacements will be assessed on a case by case basis. The unit boasts a modular construction which makes most repairs fairly easy.

Intensifier tubes are covered by Elbit's 2 year limited warranty against manufacturing defects and premature failure. In practice this warranty is 1 year and 8-11 months as Elbit starts the warranty clock as soon as the intensifier tubes are shipped from their facility. 

The unit as a whole is covered by KommandoStore's standard 30 day return policy, plus free return shipping. We will also facilitate servicing and support of your night vision, including warranty repairs if needed.

 

Specifications:

Housing:

Weight 30oz
Battery Type C123A
Battery Life User configurable 25-125 hrs
Material Glass filled nylon construction
Glass Type Custom quad overlap glass
Battery Connector QTNVG Specific
Gain Control Auto
Auto Gated Yes
Assembly
Professionally tested and assembled
Collimated and nitrogen purged
Dust Resistance IP6 - Dust Tight

No ingress of dust; complete protection against contact (dust-tight). A vacuum must be applied. Test duration of up to 8 hours based on airflow.
Water Resistance IP7 - Immersion, up to 1 meter (3 ft 3 in) depth

Ingress of water in harmful quantity shall not be possible when the enclosure is immersed in water under defined conditions of pressure and time (up to 1 meter (3 ft 3 in) of submersion for 30mins).
Warranty 1 year limited on housing, 2 year limited on intensifier tubes

 

Note: FOM = SNR*Resolution

Elbit SLG White Phosphor Tube (Thin Film Auto Gated) Minimum Specifications

Parameter
Min Max
Photocathode Response 1800

EBI N/A 2.5

Gain 2x10^-6 fc 40,000 80,000

Halo (mm) N/A 1.25

Resolution (lp/mm) 64

Signal to Noise (SNR) 24 N/A

Blem Size (in) Zone 1 (max)
Zone 2 (max)
Zone 3 (max)
>.015 0 0 0
>.012-.015 0 0 0
>.009-.012 0 0 1
>.006-.009 0 1 2
.003-.006 0 2 3


Elbit XLS White Phosphor Tube (Thin Film Auto Gated) Minimum Specifications

Parameter Min Max
Photocathode Response 1350 N/A
EBI N/A 2.5
Gain 2x10^-6 fc 40,000 80,000
Halo (mm) N/A 1.25
Resolution (lp/mm) 64 N/A
Signal to Noise (SNR) 21 N/A
Blem size (in) Zone 1 (max) Zone 2 (max) Zone 3 (max)
>.015 0 0 0
>.012-.015 0 0 0
>.009-.012 0 1 1
>.006-.009 0 1 2
.003-.006 1 2 3

 

Elbit XLS Green Phosphor Tube (Thin Film Auto Gated) Minimum Specifications

Parameter Min Max
Photocathode Response 1350 N/A
EBI N/A 2.5
Gain 2x10^-6 fc 40,000 80,000
Halo (mm) N/A 1.25
Resolution (lp/mm) 64 N/A
Signal to Noise (SNR) 21 N/A
Blem size (in) Zone 1 (max) Zone 2 (max) Zone 3 (max)
>.015 0 0 0
>.012-.015 0 0 0
>.009-.012 0 1 1
>.006-.009 0 1 2
.003-.006 1 2 3
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 17045017661

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell night vision goggles quad

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 5 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
B
Verified Purchase
Bernice Tett
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 4
My honest review of the book . Spy The Lie
Format: Paperback
Spy the Lie" by Philip Houston is a practical and fascinating guide that teaches you how to spot deception using the same proven techniques developed by the CIA. Instead of looking for unreliable body language "clues," it focuses on identifying specific verbal and non-verbal behaviors that people show when they are feeling the stress of a lie. It’s written in very clear, everyday language with plenty of real-world examples, making it a great tool for anyone who wants to communicate more effectively and know who they can really trust.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 4, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Antonios Paraschakis
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
A must have for, among others, clinical physicians and -especially- mental health experts
Format: Paperback
Very good book. The authors state in a clear and unambiguous way several "tips" that may help us detect deceptive behaviors. They repeat the points, making them easier to "stick". What's interesting is how simple they appear in their application; we are not talking about mathematical topology...The glossary completes admirably the book. Would I read it again? Definitively (a quality "seal" for me). As a physician (psychiatrist) I would definitively suggest it to all physicians that perform clinical work, but, above all, to psychiatrists...
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
Tom
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Deception Detection Primer
This book is well written and is perfect for the newbie like me to grasp the concepts: easy to follow, logically structured, points explained well and with examples, points tied together so you understand how they fit. A few reviewers think the points in the book are obvious. Many of them are, but I think the easy-to-follow writing makes the points seem even more obvious. Superficially, and taken separately, many of these ideas do seem obvious. The hard part is coming to an accurate conclusion about deception. One reason is because many deception indicators can be false positives. For example, a commonly-believed indicator of deception is crossing your arms. How do you tell if a specific instance of this behavior is a deception indicator or not? The book gives a framework for when deception indicators are, at that moment, an indicator of deception. Another reason is that verbal indicators of deception can be missed or misunderstood. The book goes into excellent detail about how to recognize verbal indicators and to tell when a verbal indicator is, in fact, likely to be deception. One of the better parts of the book, in my opinion, discussed the initial interrogation of OJ Simpson before his murder trial. They run through the questions that the detectives asked and explained how and why these questions did not work in eliciting possible deception. They then ran through the questions they would ask, following the model in the book, and explained how these questions would have been more effective. The book stresses the limits of these ideas. You will not read this book and become a human lie detector. Being really good at spotting the lies AND directing an interview to extract those lies takes, I'm sure, lots of practice. However, you CAN gain insights and be better at deception detection just from reading this book. For example, when you watch a suspect interviewed on a news show like Dateline NBC, you'll spot the verbal cues that indicate possible deception, and you'll never watch these shows in quite the same way. Prior to reading this book, I read "I Know You Are Lying" by McClish. Both books cover a lot of the same material, but from slightly different perspectives. I highly recommend both books if you're interested in this topic. I recommend reading "Spy the Lie" first, as it seems to give a more complete framework for implementing these ideas, then read the McClish book for additional insights.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 16, 2013
J
Verified Purchase
jennifer anne pocurull
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Great for recruiters & business owners
Format: Kindle
This is long but it I am so grateful and want to give my recent triumph with the help of this book....I currently own a medical spa. Our biggest challenge is hiring hard working, honest people, passionate about the business. Statistically we are average with the number of good hires but that is not a good thing when statistics say only 51% last more than 12 mos. Especially for lower level jobs being less. Many people just want a paycheck or want free services and could care less about helping customers and learning about aesthetics or medicine. Within the first few chapters I had already found ways of asking questions in interviews that when applied were astounding in getting the right response. A good example was when I was interviewing a woman whom I felt had amazing qualifications for my Front Desk Manager’s position. She had owned her own pet salon for over 17 years but sold it and went to work for Pet Smart. I thought that seemed a little strange so asked her why? She naturally had a response that she wanted to move to Texas, originally being from Wisconsin which was horribly cold and owning a business was just too stressful. I wanted to know more as this didn’t seem like the mentality of a successful business owner so I asked her what kind of paycheck she wrote herself each year. Her response was “my gross income last year was $80k, which I am so proud of.” 1) She did not answer the question. 2) “which I am proud of.” Is used to further convince me she was making good money.” Luckily as a business owner I know it probably takes at least $80.K just to run a business. But this was not enough for me to disqualify her and author Russell Targ says just 1 red flag is not enough, so after a few more positive type questions I asked another. ‘Tell me about a time you didn’t get along with a co-worker’. I’m paraphrasing because she gave an overly long explanation of events which in-and of itself is a red flag but within the overly verbose statement She stated “they get annoyed with me” but didn’t tell me what “they” get annoyed with. When I asked what ‘they get annoyed with’ she minimized a situation where she had the flu 4 days and the next day she went to an already committed dentist appointment to get her tooth pulled and was in too much pain so again had to call in sick. I was a bit suspicious at this point as to why her boss would be annoyed with this if she was such a great employee since both those explanations seemed reasonable. So I later in the interview snuck in an “assumptive question” about her being late to which she confessed several additional times having been late but of course had plausible excuses. I was even more suspicious at this point about her integrity as an employee so asked the question a different way, ‘tell me a time you had a challenging client’ to which she told me another very verbose story about “a client who brought in a badly matted dog and when after shaving it had lots of bruising etc. the lady gave a terrible rating.” I tried not to sound judgmental so I commiserated with her on that as a business owner how awful that must have felt. We exchanged some giggles and at this point I felt she really was ready to open up to me. I then asked her to ‘describe a bad day at work’ where she gave another story with many excuses why where she had ripped a dog’s ear by accident, the police and media was called accusing her of animal abuse, she was taken to court and her name was smeared in this small town which was hard to recover from.😳 Now I am a bit alarmed but the old me is wanting to believe her that it wasn’t her fault so Finally, I wrapped up after many other positive exchanges I asked ‘if I were to call her employer what derogatory things might they say about her’ to which she replied “they don’t like the way I do things which of course with further questioning her reply was to minimize all of their complaints.” Now, here is where I used to get tripped up. I usually have a phone interview that lasts about an hour or more before setting up face-to-face interview and that is how this one was. I as usual wanting to believe the best in everybody was mostly paying attention to the many positive and outstanding things she had to say and want to believe her excuses so immediately set up a face-to-face interview. But this time I did something differently after hanging up with her. I paid really close attention to the “cluster” of suspicious things she mentioned and by then it hit me like a ton of bricks. In every bad hire I have ever made they had answers like this woman where they minimized, evaded the questions, or had great excuses. Now while we all have great excuses from time to time the book says to pay attention to multiples. Needless to say I politely cancelled the interview. After reading this book the signs were as clear as day. I am happy to say I am now able to cut my phone interviews down to just 20-30 minutes even shorter when I see these “cluster” as the hook puts it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 9, 2019
R
Verified Purchase
R. Naim
Houston, US
★★★★★ 3
I spy with my little eye...
I give this book a three star for laying out the information on the how to of lie detection. Now, is this a fool proof system? No as you won't find one. But it sure does give the tools needed to start detecting lies that surrounds us daily. In the few days that I have read it, I started recognizing some of these patterns within myself and others and at times I call it out, and at times I chuckle realizing what is happening. I enjoyed the tales in the books and how the authors have used the methods themselves in various scenarios. What I was hoping more of is more stories and practical implication of it in every day lives. But over all, good book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 16, 2012

recommand products