Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
nuna pipa double stroller compatibility Nuna Flex System Frame + PIPA series adapter + Stroller Seat Bundle – Albee BabyThe Flex System Frame is travel system readycompatible with the SWIV & TRIV series bassinet, the Flex system stroller seat, and any PIPA series car seat using the included folding ring adapter. With carbon fiber strength and showroom worthy style, the featherlight frame folds in a flash and looks anything but basic. Best of all, it's built for years, not just months. No tricks. No trade offs. Because smart parents want smart systems, not shortcuts or
The Flex System Frame is travel system ready–compatible with the SWIV™ & TRIV™ series bassinet, the Flex system stroller seat, and any PIPA series car seat using the included folding ring adapter.
With carbon fiber strength and showroom-worthy style, the featherlight frame folds in a flash and looks anything but basic.
Best of all, it's built for years, not just months. No tricks. No trade-offs. Because smart parents want smart systems, not shortcuts or clunky compromises.
Features
- Carbon fiber reinforced aluminum frame
- Sleek carbon fiber weave pattern
- Ultra-lightweight and durable
- Height-adjustable 3-position pivoting handle
- 1-hand compact fold
- Stands when folded
- Folds with adapter
- Luxe leatherette pushbar
- Birth to 50 lbs
- Large puncture-proof tires
- 1-touch rear-wheel brakes
- All-wheel suspension
- Large basket holds up to 22 lbs
- Tracking device pocket
- Carry bag included
- Travel system ready–compatible with the SWIV™ & TRIV™ series bassinet, the
- Flex system stroller seat, and any PIPA series car seat using the included folding ring adapter
Specifications
Product weight:
- Frame: 8.5 lbs
- Frame + Adapter: 11.3 lbs
Recommended Usage
- Up to 50 lbs (when used with Flex system seat, sold separately)
Nuna Flex System Stroller Seat
Meet the add-on seat that gives your PIPA urbn flex system a longer life and your baby a front-row seat to the world. Designed to click on when your infant car seat days are over, or during as an alternative, this seat keeps the ride going without skipping a beat (or a step).
The recline is smooth, the canopy is generous, and the comfort? Fully upgraded. And thanks to the same featherlight carbon fiber reinforced frame, you still get that smooth fold and carry you signed up for at the start.
While others stall out after months, this system just gets smarter. No gimmicks. No trade-offs. Because growth doesn’t come with an off switch.
Use
- Seat faces both ways allowing baby to face you or the world
- Rotating and removable armbar for easier ins and outs
- From 6 months up to 50 lbs
Security
- Self-guiding MagneTech secure snap™ buckles automatically lock into place
- 3 to 5-point no-rethread harness makes it easy to fasten them in
Comfort
- 3 recline positions easily adjust with just 1 hand
- Removable organic jersey insert provides better-for-baby comfort
- Adjustable calf support and durable footrest to accommodate growth
Premium Details
- UPF 50+ water-repellant canopy is extendable and features a flip-out eyeshade and peek-a-boo window
- Luxe leatherette armbar adds style to your strolls
- All-season seat keeps baby cozy in the winter and easily converts to mesh in the summer
Seat Specifications:
- Weight: 6.4 lbs
- Weight limit: 50 lbs
- Compatible with the Flex system stroller frame
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 310 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great book
Format: Paperback
Interesting approach to the study of lynching. Thought- provoking and well reasoned thesis. The author adds a new dimension to the lynching literature
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 7, 2013
★★★★★ 5
A valuable book for non-lawyers and lawyers
Why would non-lawyers want to read a book on persuading judges? For several reasons actually. First, many of us are involved in work that requires persuading others to adopt our views. While legal argument is substantially more formal and rule-driven than what most of us do, learning how to construct a logical argument as if it were to be delivered to the court, that Is governed by deadlines, restrictions on length, the need to adhere to established fact (or to establish those facts) and to be neither groveling nor inflammatory can be applied to selling your widgets.
Perhaps more important is the fact that most people don't understand the impact of the court's decisions on our daily lives, our pocketbooks and our freedoms.
Nine people sit on the Supreme Court. They cannot be removed except for the most grievous crimes and then only if Congress were to agree. More than one Justice has demonstrated that you can be senile and sit on the nation's highest court. Going down the food chain, the same applies to the federal appellate and trial courts. It is unlikely that one person in a hundred can even name a local federal district court judge and probably not one in a thousand could name the nine Supreme Court justices.
Yet these men and women have tremendous impact on our lives, as do the thousands of state court justices.
I am not a lawyer, but I consult to them and am not a stranger to the courtroom, writing drafts for legal briefs, doing legal research and the like. I have seen a lot of judges in action and have learned, in general, to fear them. They can - and do - cause tremendous harm through ill-considered decisions, making decisions with insufficient facts, assuming they know more than they do and myriad other reasons. They are gods in their courtrooms and if your lawyer fails to persuade them of the justness of your cause, you lose.
Just how do these people reach their decisions?
While justice is supposed to be blind (fat chance!), the justices are human and thus persuadable.
Bryan Garner is a noted writer on legal writing. He is actually quite witty as he explains the use of the English language to lawyers who have had their understanding of words driven out of them in law school.
Antonin Scalia is a hero to many for the courageousness of his decisions and dissents, his belief that the Constitution is to be strictly interpreted and his generally brilliant writing style.
In 115, frequently witty, short chapters the two authors (who occasionally openly disagree) lay down their thoughts on how judges can be persuaded.
It is not all about legal writing; e.g, advice to not chew your fingernails and dressing appropriately for court. They advise on giving your oral argument, which a lot of sales and marketing people would do well to read, especially the guidance to "never speak over a judge". In a sales situation, I am surprised at how often the sales person displays his or her contempt for me by not only not listening to me, but presuming they understand the point I was going to make before they spoke over me. I don't know about you, but a lot of salespeople have lost business with me for doing that.
Some of the points the authors make are points of contention themselves: i.e., "swear off substantive footnotes - or not".
None of the material in this book is truly new. Law students get elements of it in their first year as do some college students. A lot can be found in books on to be a better salesperson: i.e., don't chew your fingernails, etc. And a lot of it is plain commonsense.
But that doesn't mean this book is unhelpful. First, it reveals in tiny part how Scalia evaluates the briefs he reads and arguments he hears, which in itself is a fascinating peek. The authors also put things many people may have forgotten through lack of use into perspective. Finally, they remind lawyers and non-lawyers alike that you often have only one shot at winning your argument so you had best put your best foot forward.
Scalia and Garner show you how to do it. Overall, this is a fun, informative and helpful read.
Jerry
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 8, 2010
★★★★★ 5
Like Having an Expert Looking over Your Shoulder
I am a law professor who spent 25 years as a Plaintiff's lawyer before deciding to teach. I've been before the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal many times and state appellate courts a few times. One caveat to consider: I expect to be arguing before the United States Supreme Court in the future. I hesitate to be too ebullient, lest you think that I'm trying to curry favor. However, I think that this book is great.
Why do I recommend it? First, it is short. This book will accomplish much of what other books try to teach about advocacy, but in many fewer pages.
Secondly, it is practical. It teaches writing skills, speaking skills, and how to be persuasive with limited time.
Finally, it is not just for lawyers. Anyone trying to be persuasive can apply the same skills to other situations.
For those of you who are politically opposed to Justice Scalia (which, believe it or not, includes some law professors)this is a joint effort by Garner and Scalia, and they frequently disagree. Hearing both sides of the argument on how to write or speak persuasively will help you decide how you want to present your arguments.
How do my political opinions and Justice Scalia's opinions mesh? Can I be fair? I think so. He's a Federalist, I consider myself an Anti-Federalist. He as supporter of administrative delegation, I think delegation of congressional responsibilities to administrative agencies is congressional abdication. In short, I'm not recommending this book because Justice Scalia and I agree on policy, because on many policy matters we don't. I'm recommending it because I think it will help you.
You wont be disappointed with the book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 29, 2009
★★★★★ 5
Great Read
Great book, I enjoyed reading it. I am non-lawyer so I spent time having to read and re-read sentences and paragraphs but darn good book. Highly recommend it. Sometimes a person can be in discussion with an official, doctor, lawyer, cop ..whatever--it helps to remember arguments made in this book. Most folks just try to explain a situation, heaven forbid standing in front of a court or judge in a legal matter. But, this type of reading builds confidence, a strong vocabulary and so forth. It matters most trying to persuade a person or an institution..just winning, making your point in a clear coherent and cognizant way. This book can teach you these things.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 20, 2025
★★★★★ 4
You don't have to like Justice Scalia to like his book.
Perhaps an appellate brief that you wrote would have been perfect if only the judge had read it. The lesson you learned, hopefully, was that there is no guarantee that a judge will read your brief. The lesson you can learn from "Making Your Case" is how to write so that the judges will read what you wrote - preferably before your oral argument. Writing in a quite candid, lucid and entertaining style, Scalia and Garner serve up tips that even the most experienced lawyers can learn from. If you find yourself approaching the court's word limit, for example, you may be minimizing the chances of having your brief read, as judges really do favor brevity. How do you write for a court that is notoriously dismissive of higher court precedents? How do you best respond to a judge who asks whether you would be content with a remand? These and other critical questions are addressed simply yet insightfully. If your legal education stressed the IRAC approach (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion), Scalia and Garner take you a step further by stressing a syllogistic approach. Even if you have already been exposed to all the best ideas about persuading appellate judges, you are still likely to gain much rom reading "Making Your Case" because the authors organize all those ideas in a way that makes them much easier to remember and keep them in mind as you prepare your written and oral arguments. Justice Scalia calls his approach to legal reasoning and argument "textualism," which I understand to mean that his decisions are driven by the language of the law and of the case. My impression from reading many of his decisions is that he is often driven by ideology, so I can't quite square his book with his decisions. I also question the book's fundamental statement that the overriding objective of a brief is to make the court's job easier, as I prefer to write primarily for the purpose of winning the case. My criticisms of "Making Your Case" are miniscule compared to those thrown at it by Richard Posner. But although I find Judge Posner's decisions generally more fair than those of Justice Scalia, I prefer the clarity of Justice Scalia's writing - especially when he teams up with Bryan Garmer. Judge Posner notwithstanding, Scalia and Garner have put together a gem that is likely to prove invaluable for law students as well as for trial and appellate lawyers who are still interested in improving their game. If you fall into either category, buy this book, read it two or three times, and then keep it handy as a reference. It should help you make your case.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2012