SKU: 23845434629
succulent bean plant

succulent bean plant Shop 'Jelly Bean Succulent - Sedum rubrotinctum' Care and Growing Guide

Sale price$22.86 Regular price$25.40
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $6.35 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 22 - Jul 27

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

succulent bean plant Shop 'Jelly Bean Succulent - Sedum rubrotinctum' Care and Growing GuideIntroducing the Jelly Bean Plant, botanically known as Sedum rubrotinctum, is a charming, low growing succulent admired for its colorful, bead like foliage. Its cascading stems make it an excellent choice for hanging baskets, window boxes, and container arrangements, where its colorful foliage can spill over the edges beautifully. Native to Mexico, this evergreen perennial is commonly called pork and beans or banana cactus due to its plump, jelly bean

Introducing the Jelly Bean Plant, botanically known as Sedum rubrotinctum, is a charming, low-growing succulent admired for its colorful, bead-like foliage. Its cascading stems make it an excellent choice for hanging baskets, window boxes, and container arrangements, where its colorful foliage can spill over the edges beautifully.

Native to Mexico, this evergreen perennial is commonly called pork and beans or banana cactus due to its plump, jelly bean-shaped leaves that give it a playful and unique appearance.

This hybrid jelly bean succulent has small, fleshy leaves that start out green but develop vibrant shades of red, orange, or bronze when exposed to bright sunlight, making it a standout in any succulent collection.

It is often used as a ground cover in rock gardens or featured in decorative containers and dish gardens.

As the plant matures, Sedum rubrotinctum typically reaches about 8 inches tall and up to 24 inches wide, forming a spreading, trailing habit.

Jelly bean succulent flowers are yellow, small, and star-shaped, blooming in clusters at the tips of their stems.

While the blooms are subtle, they provide a delicate contrast to the bold foliage and usually appear in spring to early summer.

Related Product

What truly makes the jelly bean succulent so popular is its combination of low-maintenance care and vibrant color transformation. It is drought-tolerant, easy to grow, and adapts well to both indoor and outdoor environments with proper light. Its ability to change color with sunlight adds dynamic beauty throughout the year.

When and How to Water Your Sedum rubrotinctum Plant

This jelly bean succulent is highly drought-tolerant and prefers drying out between waterings, making it more resilient to underwatering than overwatering.

The Sedum rubrotinctum should be watered once every 1-2 weeks during the growing season, with light soaking and minimal watering once every 3-4 weeks during the dormant season, with very light moisture.

During the active growing season, allow the soil to dry out completely between waterings. This helps prevent overwatering, which can cause the Sedum rubrotinctum roots to rot.

During the dormant season, your jelly bean requires even less water. It's important to remember that succulents like the jelly bean plant are more tolerant of underwatering than overwatering.

Light Requirements - Where to Place Your Jelly Bean Succulent

When growing indoors, you can grow it in the areas where it can receive atleast at least 6 hours of bright, direct light to maintain their vibrant red coloring and compact, healthy growth. 

Place it near a window that receives plenty of sunlight, but make sure to protect your jelly bean plants from direct exposure to intense sunlight, especially during the hottest parts of the day.

A south or west facing window works best, but protect it from harsh midday sun. If natural light is limited, you can use grow lights. 

When growing outdoors, it loves basking in the full sun, so find a location in your garden or patio that receives at least 6 hours of direct sunlight each day. 

When grown in direct sunlight, the color ranges from bright green leaves to red-tipped leaves, with the brightest hues.  However, it's important to note that the jelly bean plant can also tolerate partially shaded areas, especially in regions with intense summer heat. 

Newly purchased jelly bean succulent may burn if placed in full sun right away, so increase exposure gradually.

  1. If the leaves stretch or turn pale, it needs more light.
  2. If they become scorched or develop brown spots, it is getting too much sun.

Optimal Soil & Fertilizer Needs 

The Sedum rubrotinctum favors very airy, sandy soil that drains well, and NPK fertilizers once a year in spring. Planting your Sedum rubrotinctum in ordinary wet soil will result in compacted roots, stunted growth, and, most likely, root rot. Instead, make or buy a well-draining potting mix, or ideally, use our Go to Soil cactus mix blend 1 gal 4 qt cacti succulent dirt compost growing media that contains organic mycorrhizae to promote the development of a strong root system that helps your jelly bean plants and other succulents to thrive. 

A balanced, low-strength fertilizer works best for your Jelly bean succulent plant, ideally with an NPK ratio around 5-10-5, where phosphorus is slightly higher than nitrogen to support healthy growth. Apply fertilizer once in spring at the start of the growing season to give it a gentle boost to support stronger roots and better nutrient absorption. 

Hardiness Zones & More 

In the United States, this jelly bean succulent is mostly an indoor plant, but if you live in southern Florida or Hawaii, then you can cultivate it outdoors in USDA zones 9-11.

If you live in a colder climate, it's best to bring the jelly bean plant indoors or provide some protection during the winter months.

As for humidity, the jelly bean plant can handle a range of humidity levels, from drier to more humid environments. Just ensure that the soil has good drainage to prevent waterlogged conditions. 

How to Grow as a Houseplant 

Your jelly bean succulent grows best indoors in temperatures between 60°F and 75°F. It can tolerate slightly cooler temperatures during the winter months, but it's best to keep it away from drafts or extreme temperature fluctuations. As for humidity, the Sedum rubrotinctum jelly bean plant can handle average indoor humidity levels, so you don't need to worry too much about providing extra humidity. Just make sure the air isn't too dry, especially during the winter when indoor heating can cause dryness. 

Wildlife - Jelly Bean Succulent Flowers Attract the Following Friendly Pollinators 

Jelly Bean Succulent 'Sedum rubrotinctum' can attract friendly pollinators such as bees, butterflies, hummingbirds, and other beneficial insects. These pollinators play a crucial role in the ecosystem by aiding in the reproduction of plants and ensuring biodiversity.

Butterflies
Bees
Hummingbirds
Lady Bugs
Multi Pollinators
Other Birds

According to ASPCA, the Sedum rubrotinctum is mildly toxic to humans or pets if ingested in large amounts. However, it is safe to touch and handle, making it a popular choice for indoor gardens or landscaping due to its vibrant colors and low maintenance requirements.

How to Propagate Your Sedum rubrotinctum Plant 

To propagate your jelly bean plants, stem or leaf cuttings can be used. Both are simple and have a high success rate. Keep the cutting in a spot with bright, indirect light instead of direct sunlight, and give it some time until you begin to see new growth. 

Key Takeaways

  1. Jelly bean succulents are low-maintenance and drought-tolerant. They prefer infrequent watering and can handle dry conditions better than excess moisture, making them beginner-friendly plants.
  2. 'Sedum rubrotinctum' is known as pork and beans succulent or banana cactus, because of their jelly bean-shaped leaves.
  3. These succulents thrive in airy, sandy soil, and keeping roots from sitting in moisture is key to maintaining plant health.
  4. Jelly bean succulents' leaves shift from green to vibrant red or bronze, in bright sunlight.

Final Thoughts

Overall, the jelly bean succulents (Sedum rubrotinctumm) are captivating succulents with their bean-shaped leaves and trailing growth habit. With their vibrant green foliage and occasional bursts of colorful flowers, they add a touch of whimsy to any space. A succulent tends to live for many years and grows slowly. Plant them in the spring after the weather warms up. Propagating these succulents is relatively easy, whether through stem cuttings or fallen leaves. Jelly bean succulents are a delightful addition to any succulent collection, bringing charm and beauty to both indoor and outdoor settings. If you're looking for a unique and low-maintenance plant, the jelly bean succulent is definitely worth considering!

Don't miss out on this opportunity to add something truly exceptional to your garden. Order your very own jelly bean Sedum rubrotinctum today!

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 23845434629

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell succulent bean plant

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 16 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
U
UJ
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
Comprehensive, invaluable resource
Format: Hardcover, Format: Hardcover
This set is just massive. There is so much depth and insight, I don't know that I'll ever get to it all. One could literally read these volumes cover to cover because they're simply interesting and thought provoking. That said, I think it's best taken in small doses, perhaps focusing on single verses as they arise in daily life or in bible study. The physical quality of the volumes is top notch as well. This set would work well in a private library but could be equally appropriate for a church library. Absolutely recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 19, 2025
P
Peter P
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 5
Valued study tool
Format: Hardcover
This resource is phenomenal. I’ve been including this commentary set in my resources to teach through the minor prophets, and I find myself really appreciating its solid, accurate, grace-filled contents. This includes the ESV text, supporting timelines, graphics, and charts, and expansive commentary supporting the text. This set will be a valued study tool for years to come.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 20, 2025
A
Andrew D. Lossing
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
Imposing and Exceptional Quality
Format: Hardcover
The content and quality of the ESV commentary series matches that of their study Bibles. Broadly reformed, but not dogmatic on a particular angle, clear and concise, great for study. This commentary set isn't so much for digging deep in the weeds as it is for learning a solid Biblical Theology-based framework of the Bible. It's simpler than some, but much more in-depth than the ESV Study Bible, making it the next step for learning. The full set is imposing - lovely big, black hardbacks which look phenomenal on a bookshelf. Do I think this is practical for everybody? No, it might not be. You can get this kind of thing in digital form in one way or another these days (please understand that I don't like to go quite that digital, and I haven't researched what all is available). If you're pressed for living space, you might not want these. I live with a spouse in a midsize one-bedroom apartment. Fortunately, we already knew we wanted to prioritize some of our space for physical books, because we find pleasure in them. I will have to clear off some of my existing bookshelf space and relegate some books to a box in storage (consider that this set takes up all the space in a fairly large packing box, and you'll know how much you need). But it's worth it for me. I also see the acquisition of this box set as a bit of a prompt to take back up more in-depth study of the Scripture, which too often gets sidetracked by the rest of life getting in the way. Having the physical books are already something of a commitment. If all I had were ebooks or an app, I would likely never utilize them the same way. Last notes: these were packed very well. Each volume is shrink-wrapped in cellophane and none of the corners were damaged. They did a good job with that. Lastly, the price for these is fairly high. I acknowledge that. I think theological books are about on the same level, usually, however. So I did not see the need to deduct a star.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 30, 2025
P
Verified Purchase
Patrick S.
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
A fun and fulfilling book - would love to own the series
Format: Paperback
I had a lot of fun with this book. About a year ago, I really came down on the side of presuppositionalism and have studied the approach, see if it was useful against two of the leading atheistic books (God Is Not Great and The God Delusion), and now I wanted to match it up against four other views of apologetics. I will try to not go into too much detail here as I think the book is an important read for developing an apologetic standpoint. The book follows the 1)"model of Approach X is presented" then 2) "Response from other 4 approaches to counter Approach X" and then move on to the next approach. The book allows final statements from each writer for a final opportunity. Steven Cowan has a good introduction and epilogue that bookends the book well. Craig (Classical Approach) really surprised me as he brings in the role of the Holy Spirit early into the conversation. I really thought I was going to just be reading the finer points of the Kalam argument he's known for. The role of the Holy Spirit is reflected in the other authors' approaches as well and that was nice to see. It's also nice to see Craig debating with Christians for once and it's here that you really get to see his thought process contrasting with other people with the same worldview. There are issues that Craig tries to bring up against the presuppositionist view point that could be applied for him. He doesn't seem to get that all foundations are, by definition, circular because if you can appeal to something more foundational, then your foundation isn't your foundation at all. Craig seems to bring in some higher concepts about probability to make some of his points and I think that's really a miss for anyone who's not a high level philosopher (and even some philosophers might have issues understand what he's talking about here). Habermas (Evidential Approach) seems to have an undue hatred for presuppositionalism. He's also another person who doesn't realize that the approach he uses isn't really the foundation he is starting from. I think he resents doing the hard work that the other approaches then build up to. Feinberg (Cumulative Case Approach) seems to miss the point of presuppositionalism entirely. He's got the approach of what I call the "shotgun approach" in the sense that he wants to use everything possible and sees what he hits. Frame (Presuppostional Approach) does an ok job with presenting the method. I don't think he would be my first choice in representing the approach. He doesn't do a good job of explaining the "problem of circularity" isn't a problem. He just does an "ok" job. Clark (Reformed Epistemological Approach) is one I was excited to read. I liked some of his points he made when talking about the other approaches. Then I read his approach and was extremely disappointed. The biggest flaw is that he states literally that his approach doesn't help to show the Christian God is real. I would say then your apologetic method is worthless and not a real method at all. I understand the R.E. approach but if I went only with Clark's explanation and argumentation, I wouldn't have even considered it a real area of focus. The book is well laid out, the footnotes are at the bottom of the pages (SO helpful!), Cowan does a good job of wrangling the writers and offering expanded reading and other authors for each area of focus. Myself and my mentor spent from January to August every other week going over and discussing the book. Finding flaws, comparing and contrasting, and seeing where points were made and where points were missed. I think the biggest deficit we found was that the writers tended to assume agreement on definitions of words that played a big role (for example - the word "evidence" NEEDED to be defined right off the bat by every author and it wasn't until Frame in his response to the objections raised did we even have one person define it). My suggestion for this book to maximize the fun is to pick a method and try and defend that method throughout; even with the writer arguing your side. My book is filled with notes and highlights that just made this book a great enjoyment to meet and discuss with a fellow Believer about. It does not settle all the issues, but it does help you focus on the fact that we still aren't done learning yet. Final Grade - A-
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2013
L
Verified Purchase
Lyndon Unger
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 4
Great Introduction to the Various Schools of Apologetics
Format: Paperback
In reading "Five Views on Apologetics", I first had to wonder why the book was called "Five Views" and not "Three Views", since the first three authors admittedly had so much in common with each other that it seemed that their positions were subcategories of a singular system of apologetics. In fact, Habermas claimed Craig as an evidentialist on multiple occasions and admitted they had relatively minor disagreements. Feinberg was also an evidentialist, but he differed from Habermas and Craig in supposing that any one argument could possibly be persuasive to a skeptic. All three individuals definitely agreed on so much though that their three essays proved to be slightly disappointing as in the end, I figured that any one of them practically utilized a combination of all three approaches (I've heard Craig make cumulative case presentations...). I wondered exactly why they were representing different apologetic camps. Don't get me wrong: I like Craig and Hambermas and Feinberg; they're brothers in the Lord. I just find that evidentialism's off-shoots are so similar to each other that taking three chapters for the various forms of evidentialism didn't seem that worthwhile. Ironically, it seemed that the other two views of were related by what seemed like a mutual distaste for the other, Frame wrote that he "was rather disappointed at Clark's treatment of the role of the Bible in determining apologetic principles" (310) and the suggestion that Clark might not have "tried hard enough to find out what the Bible says" (310) also seemed like a needless jab, but Frame still commended Clark on plenty and suggested that "presuppositionalists too are Reformed epistemologists" (312). On the other hand, Clark wrote that Frame's essay is "the best version of presuppositionalism I have ever read" but then went on to suggest that presuppositionalism (at least as presented by Van Til) was either too confusing for him or was "obviously false" (255). Clark parroted the often repeated gross misunderstanding of presuppositionalism that "non-christians cannot know anything" (256), suggested that Frame implied this concept (257) and then spent several paragraphs refuting an obviously silly postulate; it's strange how Clark would insinuate that Frame would be so plainly stupid and I got the idea that Clark thought that all presuppositional apologists were somehow mentally lacking. Even in my early reading of Van Til, I understood that he was writing about how unbelievers cannot account for how they know anything, not whether or not they can know anything. What was even more alarming was Clarks' confession that "anyone can find some support for his or her position in Scripture" (275), as if scripture lacks a clear meaning and is somehow malleable enough to consistently conform to anyone's presuppositions. I was left dissatisfied by how Clark didn't seem to exhibit reformed theology and I was also puzzled why Frame didn't present the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (the main positive argument of presuppositionalism). What was even more humerous was how Craig presented a fairly solid version of the transcendental argument and gave Frame a slight poke for not presenting the "main course" of presuppositionalism. On the whole, I found "Five Views" to be reflective of much of my general feelings of the current state of apologetics; too distracted, too unscriptural, and too confusing. It was a difficult read at times; William Lane Craig's constant scampering into symbolic logic was frustrating and made me wonder whether the publisher clearly communicated the target audience to the authors. I was disappointed that none of the authors attempted to establish any component of their case from scriptural exegesis but instead presented philosophical constructs aided by proof texts (i.e. Habermas referenced Romans 8:16 on page 97 as `proof' that the Holy Spirit may work through apologetics to bring "full assurance to believers", arguably not the meaning of Romans 8:16). I also found myself wondering if the authors were agreeing on theological points due to lack of clarity (i.e. Craig's writing about the inner witness of the Holy Spirit was general enough that it sounded Mormon...). The book was good, and it DID expose me to five (arguably) different apologetic systems, but I hesitate to give it 5 stars due to some of the weak/unclear presentations of the systems and the thought that this isn't the best that evangelicalism has to offer. It's still a worthwhile buy and I'm likely being too hard on it. I'd recommend it as an intro book for a college level Apologetics class, or for someone who's already familiar with theology and the concept of apologetics but isn't familiar with it in depth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2009

recommand products