Pay in installments of $6.32 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 28 - Aug 2
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
rojo congo philodendron scientific name Philodendron 'Congo Rojo' – Red-Stemmed Congo HybridPhilodendron 'Congo Rojo' Bold Self Header with Burgundy Tinted Leaves Congo Rojo' Philodendron Leaf Color, Shape and Upright Growth Philodendron 'Congo Rojo' is a hybrid known for its deep green foliage tinged with red and its self heading, upright growth form. The broad, lance shaped leaves emerge in rich shades of copper, maroon, or deep red, then mature into a glossy dark green with subtle burgundy tones. Unlike climbing philodendrons, this one
Philodendron 'Congo Rojo' – Bold Self-Header with Burgundy-Tinted Leaves
Congo Rojo' Philodendron – Leaf Color, Shape and Upright Growth
Philodendron 'Congo Rojo' is a hybrid known for its deep green foliage tinged with red and its self-heading, upright growth form. The broad, lance-shaped leaves emerge in rich shades of copper, maroon, or deep red, then mature into a glossy dark green with subtle burgundy tones. Unlike climbing philodendrons, this one forms a dense, structured rosette from a central stem – compact, bold, and easy to manage.
The thick petioles and leathery leaves give it a sculptural look with very little maintenance. It’s a great plant for adding dramatic foliage without needing a pole or trailing space.
Physical traits and visual features
- Leaf color: Reddish-bronze when new, maturing to glossy green with burgundy undersides
- Leaf shape: Broad, spear-like with a smooth edge
- Growth habit: Upright, self-heading – not a climber
- Indoor size: Typically reaches 60 – 100 cm tall and wide
- Texture: Thick, slightly leathery leaves with a waxy finish
Background and growth pattern
'Congo Rojo' is a man-made hybrid, bred for its deep color tones and compact structure. While its exact parentage isn’t disclosed by cultivators, it's part of the “Congo” series of philodendron hybrids selected for non-vining, clump-forming growth. It mimics traits of some Meconostigma types, with thick, almost trunk-like stems and large upright leaves. It does not climb and requires no support structure.
This plant is toxic to pets and humans if ingested due to calcium oxalate crystals – keep out of reach.
Philodendron 'Congo Rojo' care instructions
- Light: Bright, indirect light maintains rich color; avoid harsh direct sun
- Watering: Allow top 2 – 3 cm of soil to dry before watering
- Humidity: Performs well in 50 – 70%; higher humidity supports new leaf expansion
- Temperature: Keep between 18 – 28 °C and avoid cold drafts
- Soil: Loose aroid mix with bark, perlite, and organic material
- Repotting: Every 1 – 2 years as roots fill the container
- Fertilising: Feed monthly during active growth with balanced liquid fertiliser
- Propagation: Division or stem cuttings from mature basal growth
- Hydroponics: Can adapt to semi-hydro setups with stable warmth and humidity
- Pruning: Minimal – remove old or damaged leaves at base
Common issues and how to fix them
- Leaf curling: Usually caused by low humidity or underwatering – adjust both
- Yellowing leaves: Check for overwatering or poor drainage
- Thrips or mites: Wipe leaves often and treat infestations early with neem oil
- Rotting stems: Usually caused by soggy soil – improve substrate and airflow
- Slow growth: Check for compacted roots or insufficient light
Extra tips for healthy long-term growth
Rotate the plant regularly for even growth and to prevent leaning. Clean the leaves with a soft, damp cloth to keep them glossy and free from dust. Use a heavy pot to stabilize the base – as the plant matures, the thick stems and broad leaves add weight. 'Congo Rojo' doesn't need a moss pole, and its structure stays compact, making it perfect for statement planters or modern interiors.
Etymology and cultivar information
Philodendron means “tree lover” in Greek, though 'Congo Rojo' doesn’t climb like many others in the genus. The name 'Rojo' refers to the reddish tones in the new foliage. This hybrid is part of a commercial breeding line developed for bold foliage, ease of care, and upright, space-saving form.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 24 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 3
A military reading: The cover is misleading
This book is purported to be a translation of China’s Masterplan to Destroy America written by two Colonels in the People’s Liberation Army in 1999. There is reason, but not confirmed, to doubt this. The authors of the book are clearly Chinese. Whether or not the authors are Colonels in the PLA, I feel, is in doubt, as such a plan would never be available to Western sources as quickly as it was after drafting.
The book is no “master plan.” It is a discussion of modern warfare strategy written by readers of the worldwide military strategy publications. Most of the publications have been in the United States and China. The cover of this book is misleading with the statement, “Wake up, America.” This book should be little interest to the non-military American. But it should be read by anyone with potential requirements for field grade service (Major and above,) or higher (and equivalent strategy levels in the Marines, Air Force, and Navy.) As far as “Wake Up,” I can recall discussions about strategy that contained most of the information provided within the book as a staff field grade officer in the US Army. While as military officers, we need to be aware of these issues, we are not entirely ignorant of them. The book provides a somewhat different perspective of the issues from a Chinese viewpoint.
The first point the authors make, how technology precedes its best employment in warfare. Most of the technology discussed concerns the information processing capabilities of both computers and software. It is more than computerized warfare. A large part of this is based on the technology to US Forces but not entirely. Part of the problem with technology is that mankind becomes so used to using technology to solve today’s problems that previous methods of solving problems are lost. Thus, if the technology can be crippled, it represents an exploitable weakness in war.
The second point made, is that the military forces now must consider nonmilitary actions if it is to be effective in both defense and offense. Warfare developed from point battlefields (using swords, knives, etc.,) to linear battlefields (using machine guns and artillery,) to area battlefields, to 3D battlefields (using aircraft and missiles,) to modern infinite-dimensional battlefields which include space, electromagnetic spectrums, and civilian actions. If one can start a war in a computer room or a stock exchange, is there a non-battle space anywhere? Warfare that transcends military boundaries is “unrestricted warfare.” A “kinder warfare” with critical attacks that take no lives is now possible. Technology is providing a means to attack and enemy’s nerve centers without directly harming anything else. Such nerve centers exist in an enemy’s financial systems, their economic systems, their environmental systems, their public media systems, their political systems, their power and energy systems, and their logistics centers.
A third point made is that coalitions of disparate forces, internationally, nationally, and military, are formed and broken very quickly, as quickly as within 24 hours! For example, in Desert Storm, the United States weaved together more than 30 nations in various roles. The author’s prescient comment foresaw the alignments that occurred immediately following the 9/11 attack, although this was after the book was written and not available to the authors to use as an example. There was also unity of command established. This, the authors say, stemmed from the US DoD Reorganization Act passed by Congress in 1986. All of the air forces and naval forces were under General Schwartzkopf despite the desires of the individual forces to operate independently. The air tasking order (a 300-page document) drafted in joint sessions by the Air Force, Navy and Marines, had to be approved by General Schwartzkopf before commands were issued to the various forces. The Kuwaiti Invasion Plan that the Marines wanted was put off in favor of the plan that General Schwartzkopf endorsed. Media personnel were incorporated into the military units but controlled with definitions of release timing and content.
A fourth point is that Americans want wars which achieve its national interests while having no causalities. This promotes an over-reliance on technology and an unwillingness to support prolonged war. Americans have a blind faith in technology always thinking that the road to victory is with the highest technology weapons. American military budgets are based largely on the acquisition of expensive weapon systems, and little thought given to their integrated use within the military services. American military theory is behind (consistent with point one above.) But the overriding goal is victory without casualties. Thus, the authors recommend that the secret to war with America is to kill its rank and file soldiers.
The style of the book is somewhat elliptical: it is written in the Chinese manner which often dances around a subject before coming to its subject. For example, there is a discussion of the Golden Ratio (1:0.618) before the authors show how it can be found in various ancient and modern military operations. There is considerable Chinese military philosophy discussed including the 36 Strategies, which most American military readers have not encountered ( did not at West Point when I was a Cadet studying Chinese!) I first encountered these after a reference from a Chinese Professor while I was teaching in China and then read Sun Tzu in Chinese. Sun Tzu was not the original author of these. In my personal opinion, an English translation this short book should be required reading for all Cadets at West Point.
I rate the book 3 stars for several reasons. I don’t feel the book is well written. Many of the references are transliterations of the author’s names in Chinese which do not read as the real names. At this time, the book is somewhat dated having been written in 1999. I also doubt the attribution of the source and authors of the book. The concepts presented in the book are worth thinking about for a person developing military strategies.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 16, 2019
★★★★★ 5
No complaints
Format: Paperback
Knowledge is power and everybody should read this book
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 3, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Fascinating and beautifully written.
Format: Hardcover
Clear and compelling reading of the much-neglected history of Carthage -- all its histories had been written by the victors in Rome. BTEW y four-colour photo insert was missing a page....shame on Norton, the puboisher.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Excellent Overview of Carthage
Format: Hardcover
293 pages of text/maps/b&w figures; 8 pages of color plates; 15 pages of end notes (mostly citations); 20 page Bibliography; 6 page Primary Bibliography; 2 page Acknowledgements; 8 area maps; 1 battle map [Cannae]. This is a well written history of Carthage. It provides a one source overview of the background and history of the city/empire. As a reasonably well read layperson, I am familiar at an overview level with the Punic Wars, Rome, Alexander, and the Alexandrine successor states and this book packaged Carthaginian information very well while adding interesting information that I hadn't come across before. I was somewhat disappointed (hence the 4 star rather than 5 star rating) that there was a very limited drill down to a lower level of detail, particularly from such a noted author. However, this is probably an unfair criticism given the limited amount of archeological information available and the millennia of effort that has been spent in pigeonholing Carthage according to the desired perceptions. I recommend the book highly as a well written overview of Carthage.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Brilliant book
Format: Hardcover
Brilliant book. An insightful synthesis of history, myth, and archaeology. Highly recommend.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 22, 2026