Pay in installments of $5.47 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Oct 21 - Oct 26
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
maxi-cosi mica 360 pro MAXI COSI MICA 360 PRO (SlideTech™) – Precious CargoMAXI COSI MICA 360 PRO (SlideTech) R129 approved Rear facing from 40cm to 105cm 18kg Forward facing from 76cm to 105cm 18kg Lasts from birth to approx. 4 years Isofix installation only Isofix base is included and cannot be detached The Maxi Cosi Mica 360 Pro offers best in class comfort from 04 years old, thanks to Maxi Cosis SlideTech technology, FlexiSpin rotation, 5 comfortable recline positions and an easy in harness. Designed to the highest i
MAXI COSI MICA 360 PRO (SlideTech™)
- R129 approved
- Rear facing from 40cm to 105cm/18kg
- Forward facing from 76cm to 105cm/18kg
- Lasts from birth to approx. 4 years
- Isofix installation only- Isofix base is included and cannot be detached
The Maxi Cosi Mica 360 Pro offers best-in-class comfort from 0–4 years old, thanks to Maxi-Cosi’s SlideTech® technology, FlexiSpin rotation, 5 comfortable recline positions and an easy-in harness. Designed to the highest i-Size safety standards, the seat’s integrated base features sliding technology, so it’s easier to get your child in and out of the car. Simply slide, spin & go.
EASE OF USE
- Back-friendly car seat: Certified by AGR as back-friendly
- FlexiSpin One Hand 360˚ Rotation
- Easy Sliding handle: easy to slide in and out with one hand, with the centered handle, or to slide in and out with two hands on the side
- Easy-In Harness
- Audiovisual installation feedback
- Removable and washable cover
- No need to buy a separate isofix base
COMFORT
- ClimaFlow Temperature Regulation
- 5 recline positions and best-in-class recline angles for maximum sleep comfort
- Extra padded seat with soft baby inlay and cover made with luxurious recycled fabrics
- High seating position: Mica 360 Pro provides your toddler with an elevated seating position that gives them the best view out of the window.
- Comfortable newborn inlay
- Multiple harness and headrest height positions
SAFETY
- G-CELL 2.0 Integrated Side Protection Technology
- AirProtect Safety Cushions: Patented AirProtect® technology guarantees the best head protection in case of an accident and adds additional comfort for your child.
- i-Size safety
- 5-point safety harness
- Rearward-facing from birth to 18kg/105cm and forward-facing from 15 months up to 18kg/105cm (we recommend rearfacing until 4+ years old).
- Integrated ISOFIX base with support leg
- Anti-misuse button to ensure rearward-facing travel until at least 15 months.
- ADAC gave the Mica a safety score of 2.0 which is considered "good".
GENERAL
-
Sustainable product
-
Long term use – from birth up to 4 yrs (40-105 cm)
-
EcoCare 100% Recycled Fabrics
*It can be installed on any i-Size vehicle seat with isofix and no underfloor storage compartments (please check your vehicle user guide).
The 24-month warranty covers manufacturing defects when the products are used normally and as instructed in the manual. They don’t cover normal wear and tear or damage caused by accidents. Read the full 24-month warranty terms and conditions
ACCIDENT SWAP SERVICE
If your child car seat has been in an accident, you can’t be sure that it’s still safe. Even if you can’t see any damage, it may not function properly.
Maxi-Cosi take the car seat that has been in the accident and replace it with a brand new one. So you can be confident that your child is safe – and they can get valuable information about how our car seats perform in collisions.
Been in an accident? Contact us for more information. Swap service terms and conditions
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 11 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great Contrasts
Format: Paperback
Cowan tells us, "This is a book about apologetics methodology, not a book of apologetics per se. That is, it is not a book that seeks to do apologetics as much as a book that discusses how one ought to do apologetics" (8).
Cowan has achieved the stated purposes of this book in many ways, but due to limited space I will stay focused on three examples; Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts, format, and conclusion by Cowan.
Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts (21-24) in this initial section of the book provide a clear and useful starting place for persons who are not academically familiar or comfortable with many terms used in the book. The fact that the key terms section included and defined conceptual terms supports the stated purpose of the book being a methodological rather than an apologetic book with multiple views from various writers' specific understandings and preferred styles of apologetics. As a new person to formal apologetics, this section helped launch me smoothly into the methodological discussions. I returned to these pages a few times to reacquaint myself with meaningful concepts.
The format of the discussion with proponents making a methodological case for their form of apologetic followed by critiques from supporters of other apologetic systems brought clarity to the five methods addressed in this book. This format help to highlight both strengths and weaknesses in methods. Cowan as the general editor achieved the goal of keeping the writers away from apologetics and on the goal of providing defense and critiques of these five methods. Each supporter had a unique "tee-up" to their sections. Craig starts by stating, "...methodology in Christian apologetics...raising the age-old issue of the relationship between faith and reason." He goes on further in his introduction to tell a story about his struggle at Wheaton College and why his methodology was helpful to his faith (26). Habermas clarifies that his form of evidential apologetics is, "...characterized as the one-step approach..." (92).This initial piece of information was insightful to me and a helpful clarification between classical and evidential methods. Feinberg on Cumulative Apologetics points out, "A good place to begin the discussion of apologetic methodology is to ask about the nature of the case for theism and Christianity" (148). Frame was probably the most direct in his initial statement by saying, "In apologetics, as in every aspect of the Christian life, the most important thing is to glorify God. Therefore, it is important for us to look in God's Word, the Bible, to see if our Lord gives us any directives relevant to the apologetic task" (208). In principle agree, but I will admit, I find his form of apologetics to be too circular in nature to be convincing to an unbelieving skeptic - as a standalone method. Christians I think would all say, well of course. Clark's section begins with stories meant to set the stage that it is reasonable have faith. Clark writes, "My suppose-this and suppose-that stories are intended to raise the problem of the relationship of our important beliefs to evidence" (267). Each of the five supporters of their method successfully introduced their unique method of apologetics.
Cowan regarding to his conclusions says, "Hopefully, this will not only help you, the reader, make your own decisions regarding apologetic methodology, but will also provide a basis for further discussion of the topic among scholars. Cowan's conclusions assured that main points of agreement and disagreement were clear. Here as with the other sections, the textual comments were method focused.
My criticism is pointed at the spirit of the debate. The writers did not draw enough contrasting between apologetic methods to clearly show that their individual method should be favored. I think the tone was a little too stilted in the direction of "playing" nice. In a book that purports to have five methods, there were times it seemed like only three or four methods. I guess this is inescapable give that each apologetic style can share some parts in common with another. Yet Craig shares my feeling here, I believe, based on his statement, "Pity our poor editor! Ideally he would like to find a wild-eyed fideist on one end of the spectrum and a hard-nosed theological rationalist on the other. Instead he winds up with a presuppositionalist who argues like an evidentialist..." (122).
Overall Five Views on Apologetics provides a good compare and contrast resource for anyone interested in these five common methods of apologetics.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2011
★★★★★ 5
Condense Analysis of 5 of the most notable Apologist
Format: Paperback
Looking for a quick reference guide to the major theorist of Apologic study, this book is a great resource.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Not an Intro to Apologetics
Format: Paperback
This book is not for the first-time student of apologetics. It's deep and, at times, difficult. However, for anyone with a serious interest in apologetics, this is a great way to find out which method suits your apologetic style and why. It was eye-opening for me.
I am confident that God can use most (if not all) of the five distinct methods covered in the book. But it was very helpful to me to consider pros and cons of each and decide which approach seemed appropriate for me.
Great book, if you feel ready for it!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 25, 2006
★★★★★ 4
Good overview of apologetic methods but ....
Format: Paperback
I very much enjoy the counterpoint series by Zondervan. It can help me quickly come up to speed in a variety of theological topics. This book has 5 contributors and each one presents, each one comments on each other's essay and finally each one has some concluding remarks which allows the reader to readily judge the competing opinions. However after reading the various approaches it appears to me that the apologetical approach one uses is not as important as learning the various theistic arguments (both positive and negative) and then putting them into practice. I'm not convinced that studying apologetic methods will be that helpful. This is because the various approaches overlap and also because when actually talking with people one must be very flexible and move deftly with the flow of conversation. Yet still I give this book 4 stars as there are 5 top Christian thinkers contributing to this subject.
On a personal note, one reason I read this book is because I was puzzled by presuppositional apologetics. I stand firmly in the reformed camp and I audited iTunesU courses in apologetics from Reformed Theological Seminary and Westminster Theological Seminary and was still confused on how presuppositional apologetics works in actual practice. I must sat that after reading this book I still don't see how this approach is useful in defending the faith. I have respect for John Frame but this apologetical approach seems more like a non-approach. I'll be moving on to more fruitful endeavors such as actually learning specific defenses for the Christian faith.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 23, 2011
★★★★★ 5
Academically Helpful: Not a How To Book
Format: Kindle
I have to say that I respect all of the apologists who contributed to this book. As a student of apologetics it is interesting to see the perceptions of the different methodologies, but there is no real guidance on "how to defend the faith"...so, there's that.
Truth be told, all of their methods have a place and time...it is up to the reader to discern when and where.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2014