SKU: 54930287150
can yucca cane be planted outside

can yucca cane be planted outside 6-8 FT Yucca Cane

$18.53 $20.59
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on www.warpunited.com >

Pay in installments of $5.15 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 15 - Sep 20

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

can yucca cane be planted outside 6-8 FT Yucca CaneDescription Meet the Yucca the dramatic yet easygoing guy who brings serious southwestern swagger to your space! With his sword shaped leaves arranged in stunning rosettes and towering flower spikes, this rugged beauty turns any room into a desert oasis (without the heat stroke!). Native to the Americas and built for survival, your Yucca tree thrives on neglect (the dream plant for busy people!). He's like that low maintenance friend whos naturally

Description

Meet the Yucca – the dramatic yet easygoing guy who brings serious southwestern swagger to your space! With his sword-shaped leaves arranged in stunning rosettes and towering flower spikes, this rugged beauty turns any room into a desert oasis (without the heat stroke!).

Native to the Americas and built for survival, your Yucca tree thrives on neglect (the dream plant for busy people!). He's like that low-maintenance friend who’s naturally handsome and always looks effortlessly put-together – minimal fuss, maximum impact. With these statement-sized specimens for your living room, Mr. Yucca will spend decades making your space look intentionally designed rather than accidentally decorated.



Care 

Are Yuccas hard to care for?

Yuccas are wonderfully easy to care for, making them perfect for both plant newbies and seasoned collectors. These resilient beauties forgive occasional neglect and thrive with minimal fuss, requiring just bright light and infrequent watering to stay happy.


Do Yuccas like full sun or shade? 

Your Yucca plant absolutely loves bright light and thrives in full sun, though he'll tolerate partial shade like a champ. Indoors, position him near your sunniest window where he can soak up those rays and show off his dramatic form.


How often should you water Yuccas?

Water your Yuccas every two to three weeks during spring and summer, allowing the top few inches of soil to dry completely between drinks. In winter, reduce watering to once or twice monthly – he prefers being thirsty to soggy.


Where is the best place to keep a Yucca plant?

The best spot for your Yucca tree is near a bright, sunny window with excellent drainage and good air circulation. He loves showing off in entryways, living rooms, or any space where his dramatic silhouette can make a bold statement.


What is the best fertilizer to use for Yuccas?

Use a balanced, all-purpose fertilizer diluted to half strength every few months during the growing season for optimal Yucca plant care. Skip fertilizing entirely in fall and winter – he's perfectly content resting during the cooler months without extra nutrients.


Do Yuccas need misting?

Yuccas do not need misting and actually prefer dry indoor conditions that mimic their natural desert habitat. Misting can promote fungal issues, so keep that spray bottle away from this drought-loving desert dweller who thrives on neglect.


How long do Yuccas live for?

Your Yucca can live for decades with proper care, often reaching lifespans of fifty years or more in favorable conditions. He's the kind of plant companion who'll grow old with you, becoming more majestic and character-filled with each passing year.


Are Yuccas good indoor plants?

Yuccas make absolutely excellent indoor plants thanks to their striking sculptural form, incredible resilience, and remarkably low maintenance requirements. They're perfect dramatic statement pieces that transform spaces while tolerating the dry indoor conditions that challenge many other houseplants.



Pet-friendly?

Yuccas are not pet friendly, containing steroidal saponins that are toxic if ingested. Keep these dramatic beauties safely out of reach of curious pets who might be tempted to take an experimental nibble.


Are Yuccas poisonous to dogs?

Yuccas are poisonous to dogs due to toxic compounds called steroidal saponins found throughout the entire plant. If your pup decides to take a taste test, they may experience drooling, vomiting, diarrhea, and weakness requiring immediate veterinary attention.


Are Yuccas toxic to cats?

Yuccas are definitely toxic to cats, causing drooling, vomiting, diarrhea, and weakness if your feline friend decides to sample the foliage. Position your Yucca where curious kitties can admire his dramatic form from a safe, non-nibbling distance.


Factoids

What is a Yucca plant?

A Yucca plant is a perennial evergreen with dramatic rosettes of sword-shaped leaves and occasional tall spikes of white or cream flowers. Native to arid regions of North and Central America, these sculptural beauties belong to the asparagus family (surprise!).


Is Yucca a perennial or an annual?

Yucca is definitely a perennial plant, meaning he'll stick around for years (often decades!) rather than completing his life cycle in one season. This long-term commitment makes him an excellent investment for anyone wanting enduring sculptural drama in their space.


Is a Yucca a cactus?

A Yucca is not a cactus despite their shared love of dry conditions and desert vibes. While cacti belong to the Cactaceae family, Yuccas are proud members of the asparagus family, making them botanical cousins rather than siblings.


Are Yuccas poisonous to humans?

Yuccas contain saponins that are toxic to humans if ingested in significant quantities, potentially causing stomach upset, vomiting, and diarrhea. The bitter taste usually deters accidental consumption, but keep them away from curious children (and questionable adults).


Do Yucca plants multiply?

Yucca plants multiply by producing offshoots or pups around the base of the mother plant, which can be separated for propagation. Many species also form colonies through underground rhizomes, while others can be propagated from stem cuttings.


Can you eat Yucca?

You cannot eat the Yucca plant root, which contains high levels of toxic saponins and is often confused with edible yuca (cassava). However, some Yucca flower varieties are used in traditional Central American and Mexican cuisines with proper preparation.


Do Yuccas purify the air?

Yuccas help purify indoor air by removing toxins like formaldehyde and benzene from your environment, contributing to healthier indoor air quality for you and your family. So you get a beautiful and functional addition to your home or office space.


What part of Yuccas are medicinal?

The root of certain Yucca species, particularly Yucca schidigera, contains beneficial compounds used for their anti-inflammatory properties in supplements. However, the raw root itself is not safe for consumption and requires professional preparation. Leave medicine-making to experts!


Buy a Yucca

Looking to add some serious desert swagger to your space? Our handpicked Yuccas are perfect for anyone wanting to ditch boring decor for something with actual personality – no high-maintenance drama required.

Whether you're after a compact desktop companion or a towering statement piece that makes guests do double-takes, our live video shopping calls let you meet your perfect Yucca before he ships. Point, choose, and fall head-over-heels for the exact plant that'll transform your space from "meh" to "magnificent!" Plant matchmaking has never been this fun.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 54930287150

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell can yucca cane be planted outside

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 19 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
W
Verified Purchase
West Virginia Born
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
Very insightful
Format: Paperback
I am a materialistic atheist and I liked this book a lot. Perhaps that is why Peter Enns lost his teaching position! I certainly would not agree with Enns on his religious views but I found his scholarship & willingness to stray from closed-minded literalism refreshing. I learned quite a bit about Paul and his modus operandi in dealing with OT passages. I was presented a way of thinking about Genesis that transcended "it's just a metaphor" or "its just an ancient myth". Basically, my take home messages were 1) the Bible was compiled in its final form during exilic/post-exilic times though it contains some much older material 2) the OT was written as a means of self-definition & self-explanation for the Jewish people after the trauma of exile 3) the Bible is "incarnational", meaning both divine & human (those who demand it be free of its chronological & cultural milieu are being unreasonable) 4) God can "inspire" by stooping to our level & it's unwise to tell God what he can & can't do in terms of revelation 5) the Bible has no intent to be scientific and historical in early Genesis 6) Paul is a bigger obstacle to accepting evolution to many Christians than Genesis 7) by tying Adam & Eve to original sin & origin of death, Paul re-shapes/reinterprets the story in a way that seems foreign to OT writers 8) rejecting evolution means rejecting Pauline theology for many and 9) Paul, who also re-writes OT meaning in Abraham (faith vrs law; "seed(s)", uses Adam to put Jew and gentile on equal footing in needing grace/Christ's sacrifice/obedience for salvation. Christ, as second Adam, undoes damage of first Adam for ALL (Jew & gentile) willing to accept the gift of grace. Paul uses midrash/pesher arguments for his Christological interpretations with "creative engagement" of OT texts. Again, while Enns and I probably have very little common ground for agreement, I appreciated the book & was struck by this passage at the end: "...the light of science does not shine with equal brightness in every corner. There is mystery. There is transcendence. By faith I believe that the Christian story has deep access to a reality that materialism cannot provide and cannot be expected to know. That is a confession of faith, I readily admit, but when it comes to accessing ultimate reality, we are all in the same boat, materialistic atheists included: at some point we must trust in something or someone beyond logic and evidence, even if it is to declare that there is nothing beyond what we see." While I wouldn't agree totally with that statement, it strikes me as very honest, sincere & open-minded. Good book whether you agree or disagree with it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 13, 2012
K
Verified Purchase
Kathy Sund prescher
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 4
For those that really Want to know!
Format: Paperback
I chose this rating because of the excellence of content. This author has chosen to give us, those who are truly seeking answers to difficult questions, the possibilities in finding closure or agreement with the very difficult task of merging Science, and all it entails, with our faith. I always feel pulled both ways with ther being no logical way to blend the two, I then felt I must have to give up one for the other but could not do so. This book has helped me begin the journey of understanding what I've always known to be true but could not put together. They do work. There are logical explanations for the seeming opposites of scripture and science. It's a Very important read. For years I have wished C.S. Lewis was still alive. He i have turned to for so many things. But with so many advances since his death, I have needed new thoughts as like minded as he . There are more Lewises out there!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2013
M
Verified Purchase
michaelshive
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 3
Thought-provoking but misses its "target audience"
Format: Paperback
First, the good. This is a thought-provoking book that takes complex subject matter and makes it very easy to understand. In "The Evolution of Adam" Dr. Enns does an excellent job on many fronts - most notably giving a brief overview of the history of biblical criticism and its importance to the evolution debate. His ability to distill ideas down to the core was impressive. If I had to recommend to someone 50 pages on biblical criticism I might tell them to read the first portion of this book. However, as I read the book I kept wondering how the path he was taking would allow him to argue for an Evangelical perspective (as he says in the introduction). In short, he does not. Not even close. Dr. Enns must not know his target audience very well if he thinks that this book is targeted for Evangelicals. Virtually none of the positions that he espouses in this book are even close to what an Evangelical Christian would be comfortable defending. He has little regard for any historicity behind any of the biblical accounts and frequently tosses out the phrase "most scholars agree" as a trump card. He does a good job of helping understand the culture and history that surrounded the biblical accounts yet in the end the reader is left wondering where story and history actually meet or if possibly the whole thing was simply conjured up for political reasons. In the end, I think the question the reader is left with is "does it matter if anything in the Bible ACTUALLY happened?". How you answer that may well determine how much you enjoy this book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2012
J
Verified Purchase
J. Thomas Campbell
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Peter Enns "Upends" Tradition!
Format: Paperback
One cannot but deeply admire what Peter Enns has managed to produce within the span of less than 150 pages - not counting his endnotes. Kudos as well for his penetrating exegetical insights...to say nothing as regards his courage: few conservative evangelicals (and even fewer fundamentalists) will find the title "The Evolution of Adam" something that warms the heart. And yet what Enns has produced here not only is revolutionary (in a very real sense - see below) but may well prove to be one of the more controversial books on the science/theology debate of recent years. Why so? Primarily because (according to Enns - Part Two of his book) Paul's creative use (in Romans) of the Adam and Eve story in Genesis was primarily for apologetic purposes...a matter that will be discussed in greater detail below. But we begin with Part One. Essentially Part One (four chapters) represents Enns' understanding of the crucial importance Ancient Near Eastern influences exerted upon the biblical writers - the writer/s of the Genesis creation account in particular. Enns (correctly in my view)hammers this point repeatedly for the reader to consider - i.e., the bible (the whole of it) was not written in a cultural vacuum unsullied by the surrounding culture/s of pagan religious thought, whether ancient Sumerian, Babylonian, or Greco-Roman. Indeed, to do otherwise would have been an impossibility - somewhat like trying to walk along the Tibetan foothills while refusing to breathe its polluted 'pagan' air. None of us ever fully escapes the surrounding influences of culture - and the bible was never intended to do so; rather, God (if one believes in biblical inspiration...as Enns does) works fully within the conceptual categories of culture. Hence, the two creation accounts in Genesis come to us fully embedded with the concepts of Ancient Near Eastern thought patterns. Perhaps the most we can say here is that the Genesis accounts represent (in varying ways) the "demythologizing" of prior Ancient Near Eastern accounts: the God of Israel is not to be identified with any aspect (sun, moon, stars, etc.) of the created order. So far so good. There's nothing really new here that hasn't been said already by any number of conservative evangelical scholars. Part Two, however, is something entirely different. Here Enns focuses his attention on Paul's creative use of the Old Testament, seeing as how the death and resurrection of Christ has caused Paul to look at the OT writings from a radically different perspective - Romans 5:12-21 in particular. These verses have a long, long history in the Christian Church as providing the church's understanding of how sin and death entered the world of human existence: we all "inherited" sin and death in and through the disobedience of Adam back in Eden. Not so...says Enns. And here is where his account veers off in a direction entirely different from traditional orthodox belief - for, according to Enns, Paul gave a particular 'Pauline spin' to these verses that cannot be found either in the OT itself, or in the Second Temple Judaism of which Paul himself was a part. Because the death and resurrection of Christ radically altered Paul's understanding of God's redemptive work in the world he (Paul) "found" in the Adam story an ideal explanation for why it is all Jews and Gentiles alike share in the universal experience of sin and death. Therefore, Adam's disobedience in Eden is NOT the cause of the universal human experience of sin and death (per Enns); rather, the story of Adam's disobedience served Paul's apologetic purposes...quite apart from whatever the story's original intention might have been. The true "origin" of sin and death remains a mystery, for the answer is not to be found (indeed if it can be "found" at all!) in the early Genesis account of Adam and Eve. And here is where we encounter the book's controversial nature, for Enns' view represents a dramatic departure from the traditional view - a traditional view that has a rich theological heritage that passes directly through the Reformation all the way back to Augustine. As previously stated, I deeply admire and respect what Enns has done here. For the most part I think he is on the right track. Furthermore, he makes mention of the fact that recent developments in biology have strongly indicated that we cannot possibly trace all modern humans back to an original "Adam and Eve." However, we knew that already...quite apart from modern biology informing us of the fact. Anthropology and paleontology had already amassed considerable evidence that proto-humans and modern humans were spread across the earth long before any conceivable Adam and Eve could have existed. Apparently, however, modern biology speaks with a more powerful voice than anthropology; thus, we are seeing a spate of books recently on the topic of whether or not Adam and Eve were historical - Enns' book being only one of a growing number. (Due to the geneologies in early Genesis we are somewhat limited in "how far back" we can place an Adam and Eve. Placing them 25 to 40 thousand years into the past in order somehow to allow them to be the true ancestors of all modern humans does a grave injustice to the geneologies that plain and simply do not allow for this sort of radical time reversal - a matter that any number of evangelicals, who have done this sort of thing, seem unwilling to appreciate. The early Genesis geneologies, even allowing for some "gaps," serve as a control against such unwarranted time expansion. An Adam and Eve of perhaps 6 to 8 thousand BC appears to be about the limit of what we can reasonably expect). In any case, Enns has raised a thorny and difficult issue in a way previous books on the question have not, and I believe his book will contribute substantially to more open theological discussion (one hopes without heated rancor) on the debate. In the meanwhile, some final thoughts. Personally, I find it more than a tad curious that David Rohl (a somewhat controversial Egyptologist) has recently authored a book (From Eden to Exile, Greenleaf Press) in which he strongly defends an historical Adam - and yet Rohl acknowledges that he is an atheist. All this is most strange: an evangelical scholar arguing against an historical Adam while an atheistic historian argues for one! ("What fools these mortals be!") I happen to agree with much of what Enns writes. However, I think Rohl has a point- even though how he fleshes his historical Adam out is somewhat bizarre. For one thing, I'm not entirely comfortable (despite some of Enns' powerful arguments) with a geneology of Jesus in the Gospels that would include "fictious" characters who never even existed. (I might as well inform you that my great, great grandfather was Dr. Jekyll and my great, great, great grandfather was Mr. Hyde). I don't see why getting rid of an historical Adam is at all necessary. Enns himself offers the possibility that OT Israel viewed Adam as their senior partriarch - the man who originally started the "clan." I personally see great possibilities here via leaving Adam within historical existence as Israel's original, grand patriarch. The origin of sin and death via the Adam and Eve story is another matter entirely. Biology and anthropology together appear to just plain and simply rule it out - and sticking Adam back into the age of the Cro-Magnons and Neaderthals in order to "save" the doctrine is a clear instance of an act of sheer desperation. But I see no reason why we necessarily have to conclude that the "origin" of sin and death (if that's the right word even to use...which I'm not even sure about) can only be regarded as lost in the misty past. I think there is a possible way forward here, and even via an historical Adam, while at the same time embracing what Enns is talking about. I think there may well be a way to retain a personal Adam (perhaps 6 to 8 thousand BC), while also showing how sin and death had their origin in him...but with an entirely different understanding that is informed by Enns' book. Unfortunately, spelling all that out is - like "The Evolution of Adam" - a book unto itself. And Amazon commentary is not the place where one is allowed to "write a book" - quite apart from how lengthy my own commentary here has been. In the meanwhile...kudos again to Enns for his truly provocative and highly insightful contribution to the cause. His vigorous defense of the incarnation, the atonement, and the resurrection is profoundly gratifying. Because of his firm stance here no one can accuse him of being unorthodox! (NOTE: Readers interested in a critical analysis of David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: the 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible," and why this book is of such strategic importance for Old Testament studies - scholars in particular, can easily access my recent review of this book (titled "David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History") by clicking on "See All My Reviews" directly above, or by going to the book's Amazon website. Hope you enjoy the read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 18, 2012
L
Verified Purchase
Leslie Danner
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
A must-have for students and researchers
Format: Spiral-bound
I use this all the time. The Concise Guide to APA Style (7th Edition) is incredibly helpful, easy to navigate, and much less overwhelming than flipping through the full manual. Great quick reference for papers, citations, and formatting.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2026

recommand products

Dracaena
21.03
Calla Lily
23.25
Dracaena “Madagascar Dragon Tree” – The Garden of Eden Flower Shop
29.14
Dracaena Marginata Braided
24.90
Cintho Dracaena – Plant Detectives
29.93