Pay in installments of $6.92 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 22 - Jul 27
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
nuna blue stroller Diono Excurze Stroller Blue TurquoiseNavigating city life can be challenging, especially with little ones in tow. The metropolitan minded designers have crafted a streamlined, lightweight city sized stroller ready to explore your urban oasis. Suitable from birth to 50lbs, Excurzes innovative, narrow frame and smart inline wheels have been designed to take on the city, helping you navigate downtown cafes and subways to top floor high rises with ease. Tackle City Streets The streamlined
Navigating city life can be challenging, especially with little ones in tow. The metropolitan minded designers have crafted a streamlined, lightweight city-sized stroller ready to explore your urban oasis. Suitable from birth to 50lbs, Excurze’s innovative, narrow frame and smart inline wheels have been designed to take on the city, helping you navigate downtown cafe’s and subways to top floor high rises with ease.
Tackle City Streets
The streamlined city-sized stroller with smooth rolling, smart narrow ride and inline wheels lets you navigate downtown cafe’s and subways with ease.
Easy Fold and Flip Seat
The “fold and flip” seat can be switched between world and parent facing in seconds and features multiple recline positions for baby comfort.
From Birth to Toddler
The 1,2,3 Grow with Me cocoon hood features a 3 position height setting for extra room as your little one grows. Suitable for your little one from birth up until your child is walking.
Clever Finishing Touches
Includes a one step brake, super compact fold, telescopic handles that extend to suit all heights, puncture resistant tires, padded seat and a beautiful paparazzi proof hood with adjustable heights.
- Birth to 50 pounds
- Mid-sized stroller uniquely designed with a super simple fold-and-flip seat for convenience on-the-go and storage
- Multi-position recline switches between world-facing and parent-facing in seconds
- XL seat capacity with removable padded bumper bar and adjustable calf support for comfort
- Paparazzi-proof multi-position UPF 50+ canopy with peek-a-boo window and mesh panel for air flow
- Sun visor pop-out with toy loop
- Telescopic leatherette handlebar and one-step brake
- Smart narrow inline wheels with all-wheel suspension and lockable front swivel wheels for easy navigation with ease
- Storage basket with cover
- Durable activewear-inspired, high performance fabrics in ultimate, urban luxury fashions (Black Camo & Black Platinum only)
- Rain cover and coordinating apron included
- Readily compatible with Cybex, Nuna and Maxi-Cosi car seats (adapters included)
What's Included:
- 1 x chassis
- 1 x canopy
- 1 x basket
- 1 x raincover
- 1 x apron
- 1 x bumper bar
- 1 x infant car seat adapters compatible with Nuna, Cybex, and Maxi Cosi
Specifications:
- Open Dimensions: 27 L x 21 W x 39 H
- Folded Dimensions: 14 L x 21 W x 29.5 H
- Stroller weight: 20.5 lbs
- Usage age/weight: Birth to 50 lbs
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 18 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
great book
Format: Paperback
This book was insightful yet the stories was shocking but its a dose of reality. I like the product and its great for my library.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2014
★★★★★ 5
Shocking
Format: Paperback
An informative read that will make you sick as the hanging death of people becomes a spectator sport. I knew going in I was going to be really angry about this and I was so right. It has been more than a month since I finished it and the horrific cruelty and lawlesness still makes my blood boil.And many times the "supposed law" were guilty of opening the jail or were complicit in letting this happen. It will make you think.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2013
★★★★★ 5
Great book
Format: Paperback
Interesting approach to the study of lynching. Thought- provoking and well reasoned thesis. The author adds a new dimension to the lynching literature
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 7, 2013
★★★★★ 5
A valuable book for non-lawyers and lawyers
Why would non-lawyers want to read a book on persuading judges? For several reasons actually. First, many of us are involved in work that requires persuading others to adopt our views. While legal argument is substantially more formal and rule-driven than what most of us do, learning how to construct a logical argument as if it were to be delivered to the court, that Is governed by deadlines, restrictions on length, the need to adhere to established fact (or to establish those facts) and to be neither groveling nor inflammatory can be applied to selling your widgets.
Perhaps more important is the fact that most people don't understand the impact of the court's decisions on our daily lives, our pocketbooks and our freedoms.
Nine people sit on the Supreme Court. They cannot be removed except for the most grievous crimes and then only if Congress were to agree. More than one Justice has demonstrated that you can be senile and sit on the nation's highest court. Going down the food chain, the same applies to the federal appellate and trial courts. It is unlikely that one person in a hundred can even name a local federal district court judge and probably not one in a thousand could name the nine Supreme Court justices.
Yet these men and women have tremendous impact on our lives, as do the thousands of state court justices.
I am not a lawyer, but I consult to them and am not a stranger to the courtroom, writing drafts for legal briefs, doing legal research and the like. I have seen a lot of judges in action and have learned, in general, to fear them. They can - and do - cause tremendous harm through ill-considered decisions, making decisions with insufficient facts, assuming they know more than they do and myriad other reasons. They are gods in their courtrooms and if your lawyer fails to persuade them of the justness of your cause, you lose.
Just how do these people reach their decisions?
While justice is supposed to be blind (fat chance!), the justices are human and thus persuadable.
Bryan Garner is a noted writer on legal writing. He is actually quite witty as he explains the use of the English language to lawyers who have had their understanding of words driven out of them in law school.
Antonin Scalia is a hero to many for the courageousness of his decisions and dissents, his belief that the Constitution is to be strictly interpreted and his generally brilliant writing style.
In 115, frequently witty, short chapters the two authors (who occasionally openly disagree) lay down their thoughts on how judges can be persuaded.
It is not all about legal writing; e.g, advice to not chew your fingernails and dressing appropriately for court. They advise on giving your oral argument, which a lot of sales and marketing people would do well to read, especially the guidance to "never speak over a judge". In a sales situation, I am surprised at how often the sales person displays his or her contempt for me by not only not listening to me, but presuming they understand the point I was going to make before they spoke over me. I don't know about you, but a lot of salespeople have lost business with me for doing that.
Some of the points the authors make are points of contention themselves: i.e., "swear off substantive footnotes - or not".
None of the material in this book is truly new. Law students get elements of it in their first year as do some college students. A lot can be found in books on to be a better salesperson: i.e., don't chew your fingernails, etc. And a lot of it is plain commonsense.
But that doesn't mean this book is unhelpful. First, it reveals in tiny part how Scalia evaluates the briefs he reads and arguments he hears, which in itself is a fascinating peek. The authors also put things many people may have forgotten through lack of use into perspective. Finally, they remind lawyers and non-lawyers alike that you often have only one shot at winning your argument so you had best put your best foot forward.
Scalia and Garner show you how to do it. Overall, this is a fun, informative and helpful read.
Jerry
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 8, 2010
★★★★★ 5
Like Having an Expert Looking over Your Shoulder
I am a law professor who spent 25 years as a Plaintiff's lawyer before deciding to teach. I've been before the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal many times and state appellate courts a few times. One caveat to consider: I expect to be arguing before the United States Supreme Court in the future. I hesitate to be too ebullient, lest you think that I'm trying to curry favor. However, I think that this book is great.
Why do I recommend it? First, it is short. This book will accomplish much of what other books try to teach about advocacy, but in many fewer pages.
Secondly, it is practical. It teaches writing skills, speaking skills, and how to be persuasive with limited time.
Finally, it is not just for lawyers. Anyone trying to be persuasive can apply the same skills to other situations.
For those of you who are politically opposed to Justice Scalia (which, believe it or not, includes some law professors)this is a joint effort by Garner and Scalia, and they frequently disagree. Hearing both sides of the argument on how to write or speak persuasively will help you decide how you want to present your arguments.
How do my political opinions and Justice Scalia's opinions mesh? Can I be fair? I think so. He's a Federalist, I consider myself an Anti-Federalist. He as supporter of administrative delegation, I think delegation of congressional responsibilities to administrative agencies is congressional abdication. In short, I'm not recommending this book because Justice Scalia and I agree on policy, because on many policy matters we don't. I'm recommending it because I think it will help you.
You wont be disappointed with the book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 29, 2009