Pay in installments of $5.86 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 18 - Sep 23
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
pokemon tcg card sleeve size TitanShield (150 Sleeve) Colored Small Japanese Sized Trading Card Sleeves Deck Protector for Yu-Gi-Oh, Cardfight!! Vanguard & More (Gold)Dual textured for the perfect tabletop gaming experience ultra clear on face side, anti slip on backside. Premium quality thickness at 140 microns compared to standard 90 microns, which gives you an even better hand feel in games. Perfect for Japanese trading card games such as YuGiOh and Cardfight!! Vanguard TCG. Also a fit for Kpop Photocards. Sleeve Size 62x89mm Card Fit For cards measuring up to 5986 mm (2 5 16x3 3 8). Thickness 140 microns
Dual textured for the perfect tabletop gaming experience- ultra clear on face side, anti-slip on backside. Premium quality thickness at 140 microns compared to standard 90 microns, which gives you an even better hand feel in games. Perfect for Japanese trading card games such as YuGiOh and Cardfight!! Vanguard TCG. Also a fit for Kpop Photocards.
| Sleeve Size | 62x89mm |
| Card Fit | For cards measuring up to 59×86 mm (2 5/16″x3 3/8″). |
| Thickness | 140 microns |
| Material: | PVC-free virgin polypropylene. Acid free. Archival safe. |
| Compatibility: | Compatible with TitanShield 9-Pocket Trading Card Pages. |
| Warning: | Does not fit MTG Magic The Gathering, Pokemon TCG, or American Board Games. Please purchase standard-sized card sleeves instead. |
| Opacity: | Full opacity for black, green, blue or purple-colored sleeves. Please be cautioned that other colors are approximately 80% opaque only due to the nature of the color itself. |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 5 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Chewing pups love them.
My 8 mo Morkie loves them . The other two won't touch them . They're heavier than I expected but Belle doesn't seem to mind that. Great for dogs that like to chew!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 19, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Meh..., I'll stick to fave pig ear chews
Only 4 for $6, idk these don't last long. I wanted to try them because my dogs love being spoiled but I think I'll stick to pig ears at a discount from Petco. They are very hard, some chews crumble or soften as the dogs knaw at them during the day. However these chews didn't last longer than 10 minutes compared to actual no rawhide alternatives I have used. These didn't do that. No upset stomach so that's a plus. The smell was similar to pig ears also, texture was different. No slimy residue w/ it unlike with the regular 100% pig ears. Helped with plague build up but there is still plague on insicor tooth. Probably won't buy again, meh.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 16, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Dog bones
Good price dog likes it not enough in bag and can choke if dog chews it down
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Perfect for my medium dog
My dog loves these alternatives to pigs ears. Easier for her soft mouth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 4, 2026
★★★★★ 1
bag came ripped
bag came ripped so the chewy pig ears were not chewy they were hard, I didnt even give them to my dog. The worst part is they are not returnable or refundable - what a waste of money
So not acceptable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 14, 2025